However, if you’ve tried both the A9 and A7RIII you’ll quickly notice that Sony is just damn good at AF these days regardless of the body. Full Frame 24.3 Megapixel Sensor; In-body Image Stabilization: This gives you up to a 4 stop advantage when shooting in low light. Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications and our personal experience with the two Sony Alpha series cameras. Guide:Menu and Button Setup for Sony A7 / A9. I hike and also use the camera as a walk-around camera occasionaly I might shoot short videos (like an interview). As a Fujifilm user, he had the latest X-T3, so we decided to swap cameras to allow us to play around and get our thoughts. Hey, I'm looking at upgrading to either bodies from a 70D with the intention of doing wedding photography. Note that prices are as of early January 2021. The latter is the same method used by the A7 II at 5fps so there is no live view. When there are attractive deals on the A7 mark II, they make the camera a tantalising proposition for those who want to enter to the world of full frame/35mm format without breaking the bank. The A7 III boasts a 24 megapixel sensor - but so do the A7 and A7II . If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. It can record in Full HD up to 50/60p and 50Mbps. The A7ii battery is good for around 350 shots, meaning photographers would need a bundle of spares to see them through the day. And what’s more, Sony’s latest A7 offering will also shoot up to 10fps in Silent Shutter mode; ideal for either wedding photographers or those photographing easily spooked wildlife. Note that the burst speed can decrease as a result and this function is not available with the e-shutter or in movie mode. The touch functionality is limited though, and it can’t be used for scrolling through images or making menu selections as you might expect. The A7SIII and A7RIII are two different specialized versions of the camera, with the A7SIII covering some of the video issues that I talked about above, and the A7RIII having a higher megapixel processor. I like it a lot but the af is not great. When it comes to its ergonomics, the A7 III features Sony’s latest generation mirrorless body design which brings it up to date with its siblings: the A7R III and A9. The A7 II by comparison has a less advanced AF system with 117 phase and 25 contrast detection points. It is the same used for the flagships A7r III and A9 and is one of the best you can find for a mirrorless camera. ” I felt the same as you and still disike the fact that the a7 grew in size and weight (even more so with a7iii). Concerning connections, the A7 III has a faster USB 3 port (type C). In fact, Sony claims that the new camera can record 710 shots (or 610 with the EVF) which is the highest of all mirrorless cameras by CIPA standards. The A7 II was the first camera to feature this technology in the E-mount series and the A7 III brings a minor improvement to the performance. In our real world tests however, this difference is rarely relevant, especially for stills: the slow shutter speeds I was able to use with the A7 II are more or less identical to those I can manage with the mark III version. More specifically, the new camera features 693 phase detection points that cover 93% of the sensor area, and 425 contrast detection points. However, despite the reduction in screen pixels the A7iii LCD is touch sensitive, allowing you to set the AF point with the tap of a finger for faster handling and to zoom in to check image focus. The camera fits nicely in the hand, with an improved grip size making it much more comfortable to shoot with, particularly when using larger lenses. Eye AF now works in AF-S, AF-C and with A-mount lenses, unlike the A7 II with which you could only use it in AF-S and with native E-mount lenses. Sony has introduced a backlit sensor to their flagship a7 camera. The A7 III has two SD card slots, with the first one offering UHS-II compatibility, whereas the A7 II only has one UHS-I slot. One of the key reasons why CSCs demand so much battery power is the EVF. Both cameras feature 5-axis sensor stabilisation. While it may not have the same processing speed as the flagship, the A7 III share the same amount of AF points. Below: a quick video we recorded with the A7 II in 2014. Sony a7III vs Fuji X-T3: Real World Wedding Photography Comparison. The first and the most obvious reason to choose the Sony A7III is the price. By comparison, the A7 II can shoot at full speed for approximately 50 frames in JPG or 20 frames in RAW (compressed). In scenes that present fluorescent and other types of artificial light, the A7 III can activate an Anti-Flicker option. The A7iii features a newly designed 35mm Exmor R full frame sensor with a 24.2MP resolution. The cameras in Sony's Alpha range are well-known for their superb sensors. Wireless capabilities include NFC and Wifi, but the new camera also gets Bluetooth to geotag your images. The very discerning will know which they need. DJI Mavic Air vs Mavic Pro, Which Drone is Better? I know I wouldn't regret getting an A9, and if I get the A7iii I might end up wishing I'd got the A9. The A7 II uses the old NP-FW50 which has never been famous for its endurance (2.2x less capacity in comparison to the FZ100) and has a 350 shot rating. 2. I have a Sony A7ii and a 200-600mm lens. Yes, the a7iii is pretty strong at autofocus as it inherits the A9 AF minus the stacked sensor. Currently it has an RRP of £1350, though better deals can be found, making it a truly appealing camera for those on a budget wanting a full frame mirrorless. Sony Alpha A7R III vs A7 III: LCD screen Both cameras feature 3-inch tilting touchscreen displays, but the A7R III screen has a higher resolution of 1,440,000 dots versus 921,600 on the A7 III. For peace of mind both cameras are constructed from durable magnesium alloy and they are dust and splash proof. It only comes with one storage slot. Only 24 Megapixels, which is 18 less than the Sony a7RII. In our tests, the A7 III did very well with birds in flight, football and various events, proving to be more precise and reliable that its predecessor. While both come with ports for both microphone and headphone inputs, the A7ii can capture Full HD at 60fps. The A7iii massively outpaces its predecessor with a top shooting speed of 10fps – that’s with Continuous Autofocus and Automatic Exposure – and can capture 177 continuous JPEGs or 89 RAWs. A significant improvement you will experience on the A7 III is the new battery (NP-FZ100). Both cameras feature a mic input and headphone output, record internally with 8-bit 4:2:0 and can output a 8-bit 4:2:2 signal via HDMI. Up to 8fps, the A7 III gives you live view with blackouts while at 10fps, the last image taken is displayed instead. Differences between the Sony a7II and a7III Sensor & Processor. According to Sony, the updated image processor should improve colour reproduction of skin tones and nature/landscape images, amongst other things. Sony A7 III vs A7R III vs A7S II: Video The Sony A7 II (above) was a credible choice for video recording, but it lacked the option to shoot in 4K. The refinements to the controls and design make the A7 III appreciably easier to handle than the A7 II. Get the Sony a7RII now! There’s also been a few tweaks to the body design between these two generations, and the improvements have been inherited from the top end A9 and A7Riii. If you want to find out the most important differences in less than a minute, check out the video below. This isn’t a feature comparison, just some ideas comp… When all three cameras were upgraded to the Mark II generation around 3 years ago, the A7ii lagged behind the pace of its siblings on certain specs – particularly the autofocus offering – and this was reflected in the pricing. Here are the results and some examples. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. The Sony A7 vs the A7S and A7R. Picture Profiles are available as well with a few additions including S-Log3 and HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma) which works with HDR compatible TVs. Granted, it is more expensive than the A7 II, but the price remains more than reasonable considering the features on offer. There are discounts that come and goes and that can lower the price further, and of course you can easily find it second-hand. Looking at the features of these two cameras- Sony a7RIII Vs a7III, we found out that they were pretty similar. You’ll also find that AF is available in Focus Magnifier mode on the new camera. All the rest is much better: new body, better menu, dual sd card slot, extremely good battery life, new sensor, better Dynamic Range, better high ISO performance, faster in general, faster AF. Both cameras are dust and moisture resistant and have a magnesium alloy chassis. Arguably the biggest drawback of shooting with a CSC has traditionally been the battery performance, since these cameras are very power hungry. Thank you! Furthermore, the A7 III received various updates via firmware, including Eye AF for Animals which works really well. In this video, Chicago based photographer Manny Ortiz shows us the differences side-by-side. October 16 of 2013 marks an important milestone in the history of photography, because it is the date when Sony announced world’s first full-frame mirrorless cameras, the Sony A7 and A7R. Some may view the resolution reduction as a negative, but it makes no discernible difference to detail captured and the new design of the sensor makes for an overall better performance in areas including Dynamic Range, ISO, shooting speed and autofocus. Sony a7RIII Vs a7III – Comparison Overview. Overview – A7II. The newer A7 III version has both options, as do the other two cameras. Below: an official 4K video from the Sony Youtube channel.