[–]0x4447 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children), [–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago (0 children). Every GB your EC2 instance sends out is another $0.09/GB. For that tiny website, I think you are overthinking it. EC2 are more secure, robust and easily scaleable. The cloud outage lasted roughly 30 minutes, but took down the Web sites and services of many major Amazon cloud customers, including Netflix, Reddit and Foursquare. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. A2 Hosting AdvancedHosting Alibaba Cloud Alwyzon Amazon EC2 Amazon Lightsail ArticHost Aruba Cloud Atlantic.Net Bluehost BudgetVM BuyVM Clouding.io CloudSigma Contabo DigitalOcean Dreamhost Genesis Public Cloud Genesis VMs GigsGigsCloud Google Compute Engine Hetzner Hostinger Hostwinds IBM Cloud InMotion Hosting IONOS by 1&1 IO … Lightsail instances have a flat cost that includes bandwidth, whereas EC2 bandwidth is charged based on usage. When you’re ready for a high-availability setup, Lightsail now offers load balancing, block storage, and high-availability databases. Each attached disk is automatically replicated within its Availability Zone to protect you from component failure. Looking around Lightsail is a much simpler and cheaper solution; so I started migrating. It consists of two spacecraft—LightSail 1 and LightSail 2.LightSail 1 was an engineering demonstration mission designed to test its new sail … Creating Amazon EC2 instances from exported snapshots in Lightsail. If you're posting a technical query, please include the following details, so that we can help you more efficiently: Does this sidebar need an addition or correction? The costs of development and ownership of your home grown serverless solution is going to dwarf the other suggestions. With how quickly and easily you can get set up with Lightsail, you can always switch to other services with very little sunk cost. I have a blog website. EC2, of course, has many more instance families and classes other than the t2, almost all of which are more "powerful" (or better equipped for certain tasks) than these, but also much more expensive. Just to make sure we are on the same page: Lightsail and Beanstalk are nothing more then basically CloudFormation files that use other AWS resources like EC2, they just give you a UI that makes it “simpler” to manage? AWS (Amazon Web Services) Lightsail is a cloud computing service that you can use to host web applications and website.The technology provides the simplest way to manage Virtual Private Servers. Lightsail block storage disks are designed for 99.99% availability. And the above doesn't include bandwidth. Amazon Lightsail is the easiest way to launch and manage a virtual private server with AWS. This is good advice, OP. So I just tried that, figuring it's a good test of my backup, as the main reason we used Lightsail vs EC2 was due to how it's easier to just take a snapshot and restore it. You mentioned you are serving images from CloudFront. Amazon Lightsail. But, if I had a personal project that I couldn’t do with lambda or Fargate and I needed an EC2 instance, I wouldn’t want to muck with the complexity of AWS proper and would definitely go with LightSail. 3 years upfront = $46 / 3y = $15y. Whereas, in EC2, an enterprise might pay $90 per TB. So, whatever you choose you are using EC2 Regardless. Lightsail also supports disk snapshots to allow regular backups of your data. Go to Amazon EC2 Go to Amazon Lightsail Last updated on December 24th 2020 Select providers for new comparison. I started building it in Lightsail and serving images with CloudFront but I hear elastic beanstalk and EC2 can be good options. Amazon is always expanding its regions, which means that Lightsail would also be available in new regions over time. Any of those would do, but honestly, $5/month DigitalOcean droplet would be the fastest and easiest way to host it in the cloud. The biggest difference between both cloud services, EC2 and Lightsail can be understood in terms of prices. And you'd get 1TB of data transfer. While this would probably be very close to free for hosting costs, spending $5 a month on a server is also basically free. While the EC2 instances are very much pay as you consume resources, the Lightsail instances are more of a flat fee packaged cost. Each page of the Lightsail console includes a Quick Assist tab. © 2021 reddit inc. All rights reserved. If you are simply caching the images and the origin is the Lightsail instance, you might want to consider setting up an S3 bucket and making that the origin for your static assets (javascript and css included). You can manage all your EC2 instances from EC2 interface. So as with everything that AWS manages for you - it is more expensive, which is good in the initial stage of a company. Networking is an essential part when working with AWS EC2 and many other services. For example, $5 per month or $20 per month. So, in terms of Amazon EC2 vs Lightsail, you should prefer EC2, if you are from a VPS background. Lightsail vs Beanstalk vs EC2 (self.aws), submitted 1 year ago by RelativeAtmosphere. I know the ins and outs of AWS pretty well from a development, devops, and operations standpoint. Amazon Lightsail is a service by Amazon that is very similar to the EC2 cloud except more prepackaged. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. [–]0x4447 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (2 children), I did just check the pricing, and this is what I expected, the EC2 and RDS instances are more expensive. Also I think corresponding Lightsail instance memory is higher (1GB) vs EC2 nano 512 MB – Andriy F. Dec 4 '18 at 13:39 Note that while this was true in 2017, as of 2019, Lightsail can easily be cheaper than ec2, for compute alone. The one exception is the smallest-sized instance, with 512 MB of RAM and 20 GB of solid-state drive (SSD) storage, which dropped from $5 per month to $3.50. What isn’t up front is that, like EC2, you are actually charged for your Lightsail … I spend only just an hour to do anything above and start write blog post immediately. If you have a seasonal traffic and you need sometime more server resources and sometime less, then you can use EC2 where you can fine tune the resources easily, according to the requirements. [–]WayBehind 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago (2 children). So those tools that AWS provides, can help abstract the complexity For sure, but it makes it harder to understand what type of instance are running. I hope this information will help you make the right decision :), [–]Nick4753 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (4 children). It provides simple un-managed VM instances, where you can do whatever you want. With this feature, Lightsail offers an additional way to grow your applications and scale your cloud deployments by utilizing the full selection and configurability of EC2. DigitalOcean - Deploy an SSD cloud server in less than 55 seconds with a dedicated IP and root access. If you do everything manually, then you know exactly what you have and what you pay for.