Who did the Tariff of 1816 hurt? The tariff sought to protect northern and western agricultural products from competition with foreign imports; however, the resulting tax on foreign goods would raise the cost of living in the South and would cut into the profits of New England's … The South had an economy based on agriculture and longed for free trade to export cotton to Europe and its booming textile industry whereas the … The Levy of 1816 was a gently protectionist measure, raising the normal rates to around 20 percent. In the wake of the conflict with Britain, nationalist war-hawks like Henry Clay and John Calhoun sought to nurture independent industry that had sprung up during the Embargo era, while reducing reliance on British manufactures. Average duties stood at around twenty-five percent ad valorem. In his 1844 presidential bid, "Great Compromiser" Henry Clay argued for severe tariffs to protect American industry. The tariff helped the North because most of the nation's factories were located there.However, it did little help the South, which remained mostly an agricultural region. On this date, the Tariff of 1828—better known as the Tariff of Abominations—passed the House of Representatives, 105 to 94. Prior to the War of 1812, tariffs had primarily served to raise revenues to operate the national government. Tariffs particularly favored the North and their manufacturing plants. During the War of 1812, many Ohio businesses began production to replace English goods no longer accessible to Americans. Even so, the Tariff Act of 1816 was only mildly protectionist, more in keeping with those enacted since 1789 than with those that would follow after 1820. John C. Calhoun, who might later be an impassioned enemy of high taxes, bolstered protectionism since he accepted that the Southâ's future would incorporate modern advancement. By imposing a Protective Tariff on imports from foreign lands, the Northern manufacturers would benefit because since … The Tariff of 1816 helped businesses in Ohio to compete with European factories. To protect infant manufacturers, Congress passed the nation’s first protective tariff: the tariff of 1816. The British had stashed large quantities of manufactured goods in warehouses during the war, but when peace was achieved in 1815, a flood of these goods was dumped on the American market. Tariff of 1816: Protecting American Manufacturing. Congress attempted to raise tariff levels with the Baldwin Tariff of 1820 but failed by a single vote in the Senate. The recently concluded War of 1812 forced Americans to confront the issue of protecting their struggling industries. The Tariff of 1816 was a protective tariff made by James Madison to help pay for internal improvements, like roads, canals and lighthouses. 1816 The 14th Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1816 levying a series of 25 percent duties designed to encourage domestic manufacturing. Another unique aspect of the tariff was the strong support it received … Every North Carolina Congressmen voted against this measure. Indeed tariffs were a major issue as well. It highlighted the division between the South and the North The opposition between the North and the South in Antebellum America was not due exclusively to Slavery. More than a year after U.S. President Donald Trump fired the first tariff salvo that eventually led to a trade war with China, the debate about who actually bears the burden of … People in the North and the East really supported the tax, but people in the south and west didn't rely on manufacturing, resented the government, because it would make the goods more expensive. The Tariff of 1816 (also known as the Dallas tariff) is notable as the first tariff passed by Congress with an explicit function of protecting U.S. manufactured items from foreign competition.